Wilson v. Kerestes et al

Filing 15

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). The Report and Recommendation (Doc.10) is ADOPTED. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis(Doc.2)is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to REMAND this case to a Magistrate Judge for further proceedings consistent with this Order. (See Order for complete details). Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 2/12/15. (ga)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ____________________________________ : DARRELL WILSON, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : JOHN KERESTES, et al., : : Defendants. : ____________________________________: Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-3076 (Judge Kosik) ORDER AND NOW, THIS 12th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2015, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 10) of Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Blewitt is ADOPTED; (2) Plaintiff’s claim for compensatory damages against Defendants in their official capacities is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (3) Plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages against Defendants in their official capacities is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (4) Plaintiff’s First Amendment right of access to the courts claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (5) Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment Due Process claim against Defendants is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (6) Plaintiff’s defamation of character claim against Defendants is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (7) Plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendants Luquis, Muick, Corbacio, Miller, Lewis, and Kerestes is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (8) Plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation claim will PROCEED against Defendants Mayer and Bisel; (9) Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) is GRANTED; and (10) The Clerk of Court is directed to REMAND this case to a Magistrate Judge for further proceedings consistent with this Order. s/ Edwin M. Kosik_______ Edwin M. Kosik United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?