CASTANERA v. MCVEY

Filing 32

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, construed as a Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 22) is DENIED. 2. The Clerk is DIRECTED to STRIKE Plaintiffs Motion to Pr oduce. (Doc. 27).3. Plaintiffs motion for leave to file additional interrogatories (Doc. 28) is DENIED as moot. 4. Plaintiffs motion to substitute successor party is DENIED as moot. (Doc. 29). The Clerk is DIRECTED to update the docket to reflect this automatic substitution. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick on 6/5/2014. (cw)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RYAN CASTANEIRA,
Plaintiff

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-CV-03108

v.

(MUNLEY, J.)
(MEHALCHICK, M.J.)

CATHERINE McVEY,
Defendant
ORDER
AND NOW, this 5th day of June, 2014, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum
filed concurrently herewith, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, construed as a Motion for Default
Judgment (Doc. 22) is DENIED.
2. The Clerk is DIRECTED to STRIKE Plaintiff’s Motion to Produce. (Doc. 27).
3. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file additional interrogatories (Doc. 28) is DENIED as
moot.
4. Plaintiff’s motion to substitute successor party is DENIED as moot. (Doc. 29). The
Clerk is DIRECTED to update the docket to reflect this automatic substitution.

BY THE COURT:

Dated: June 5, 2014

s/ Karoline Mehalchick
KAROLINE MEHALCHICK
United States Magistrate Judge