Woodson v. Belbalso et al
Filing
47
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), ORDER DISMISSING CASE 1.Petitioners petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254, (Doc. 1), is DENIED without an evidentiary hearing.2.Petitioners motion to amend h is habeas petition, (Doc. 37),is DENIED. 3.Petitioners motion to stay his habeas petition, (Doc. 45),is DENIED. 4.There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate ofappealability.5.The clerk of court is directed to close this case.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 3/30/16. (bs)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LARRY WOODSON,
Petitioner
:
:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14-0558
v.
:
(Judge Mannion)
THERESA DELBALSO, et al.,
Respondents
:
:
ORDER
Based on the foregoing memorandum considering petitioner Woodson’s
petition for writ of habeas corpus, the entire record, and respondents’
response, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1.
Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254, (Doc. 1), is DENIED
without an evidentiary hearing.
2.
Petitioner’s motion to amend his habeas petition, (Doc. 37),
is DENIED.
3.
Petitioner’s motion to stay his habeas petition, (Doc. 45),
is DENIED.
4.
There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of
appealability.
5.
The clerk of court is directed to close this case.
s/ Malachy E. Mannion
MALACHY E. MANNION
United States District Judge
Dated: March 30, 2016
O:\Mannion\shared\MEMORANDA - DJ\CIVIL MEMORANDA\2014 MEMORANDA\14-0558-01-Order.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?