McLaud v. Industrial Resources, Inc. et al

Filing 82

ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) The Motion for Summary Judgmnt (Doc 62) filed by Defendant IR Ventures, Inc. is GRANTED. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendant and AGAINST Plaintiff on all claims. (2) The Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 65) filed by Defendant CHEP (U.S.A.) Inc., CHEP International, Inc., and CHEP Container and Pooling Solutions, Inc., is GRANTED. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendants and AGAINST Plaintiff on all claims. Because Plaintiff agrees that there are no claims against defendant Dykstra, all claims against defendant Dykstra are DISMISSED. (4) The Clerk of Court is direct to mark this case CLOSED.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 12/5/16 (jam)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ASHLEY MCLAUD,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14-CV-00737

Plaintiff,
v.

(JUDGE CAPUTO)

INDUSTRIAL RESOURCES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.
ORDER
NOW, this 5th day of December, 2016, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
(1)

The Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 62) filed by Defendant IR Ventures,
Inc., is GRANTED. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendant and
AGAINST Plaintiff on all claims.

(2)

The Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 65) filed by Defendants CHEP
(U.S.A.) Inc., CHEP International, Inc., and CHEP Container and Pooling
Solutions, Inc., is GRANTED. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendants
and AGAINST Plaintiff on all claims.

(3)

Because Plaintiff agrees that there are no claims against Defendant Dykstra,
all claims against Defendant Dykstra are DISMISSED. Defendant Dykstra’s
Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 45) is therefore moot.

(4)

The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case as CLOSED.

/s/ A. Richard Caputo
A. Richard Caputo
United States District Judge