Njos v. Thomas

Filing 107

ORDER denying 96 Respondents Motion for Reconsideration; denying without prejudice 98 Petitioners Motion for Costs; and, denying 101 Petitioners Objections. This case will remain CLOSED. Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 2/1/2017 (emksec, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ____________________________________ : SCOTT J. NJOS, : : Petitioner, : : v. : : WARDEN THOMAS, : : Respondent. : ____________________________________: Civil Action No. 3:14-CV-0766 (Judge Kosik) ORDER AND NOW, THIS 1st DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2017, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (1) Respondent’s Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 96) is DENIED; (2) Petitioner’s Motion for Costs (Doc. 98) is DENIED without PREJUDICE; (3) Petitioner’s Objections (Doc. 101) are DENIED; and, (4) This case will remain CLOSED. s/Edwin M. Kosik Edwin M. Kosik United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?