Kollien v. KMart Corporation

Filing 41

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), DENIED re Future medical expenses and GRANTED re lay tesyimony re medical, but allowing pltf to testify.Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 10/21/16. (sm)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DIANNE KOLLIEN,
Plaintiff

:
No. 3:14cv1041
:
:
(Judge Munley)
v.
:
:
KMART CORPORATION,
:
Defendant
:
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
ORDER
AND NOW, to wit, this 21st day of October 2016, the defendant’s
motions in limine (Doc. 34) are DENIED in part and GRANTED in part as
follows:
1) Defendant’s motion in limine with regard to future medical
expenses is DENIED and evidence of such expenses will be admissible at
trial; and
2) Defendant’s motion in limine to preclude lay testimony regarding
plaintiff’s medical diagnosis, causation, and/or prognoses is GRANTED as
unopposed. Plaintiff, herself, however, will be allowed to testify as to the
facts of her injury to the extent that such facts are within her knowledge
BY THE COURT:
s/ James M. Munley
JUDGE JAMES M. MUNLEY
United States District Court