Hawk et al v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC et al

Filing 55

ORDER 1. Plaintiffs' Objection, (Doc. 50), is OVERRULED. 2. Defendant Carrington Mortgage Services LLC's Limited Objection, (Doc. 49), isSUSTAINED. 3. The Report and Recommendation, (Doc. 47), is ADOPTED AS MODIFIED for the reasons stated b oth therein and in this Court's accompanying memorandum opinion. The Court will not permit Plaintiffs to amend their complaint. 4. Defendant Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 38), is GRANTED in its entirety. 5. Judgment is entered IN FAVOR OF Defendant Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC and AGAINST Plaintiffs Douglas Hawk and Cathy Hawk. 6. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 8/17/16. (jfg)

Download PDF
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DOUGLAS HAWK and CATHY HAWK \ Plaintiffs, v. 3:14·CV·1044 (JUDGE MARIANI) CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC, and CHRISTIANA TRUST, et al., t ! i i t I I t ! Defendants. ~ I ORDER AND NOW, THIS ~AY OF AUGUST, 2016, upon de novo review of Magistrate t l t I f Judge Carlson's Report and Recommendation, (Doc. 47), the parties Objections thereto, and all related filings, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiffs' Objection, (Doc. 50), is OVERRULED. 2. Defendant Carrington Mortgage Services LLC's Limited Objection, (Doc. 49), is SUSTAINED. 3. The Report and Recommendation, (Doc. 47), is ADOPTED AS MODIFIED for , the reasons stated both therein and in this Court's accompanying memorandum opinion. The Court will not permit Plaintiffs to amend their complaint. f I ! f f ; y ! t } , i r t ! t f 4. Defendant Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 38), is GRANTED in its entirety. 5. Judgment is entered IN FAVOR OF Defendant Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC and AGAINST Plaintiffs Douglas Hawk and Cathy Hawk. 6. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?