Bryant v. Wilkes-Barre Hospital Company, LLC

Filing 87

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). re: motions in limine. Doc. 59 granted in part and denied in part; doc. 61 - denied; doc. 63 denied; doc. 65 granted in part and denied in part; doc. 67 denied; doc. 78 granted in part and denied in part. (See order for details).Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 7/6/16. (bs)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANEESHA BRYANT, : Plaintiff : v CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14-1062 : (JUDGE MANNION) WILKES-BARRE HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC, : : Defendant ORDER For the reasons stated in the court’s memorandum issued this same day, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff’s motion in limine to preclude the Hospital from presenting any evidence regarding her Facebook page, (Doc. 59), is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as specified in the court’s memorandum. 2. The Hospital’s motion to preclude plaintiff from making any reference to Community Health Systems’ ownership interest in the Hospital, (Doc. 61), is DENIED. 3. The Hospital’s motion to preclude plaintiff from introducing the Pharmacology Workbook into evidence, (Doc. 63), is DENIED. 4. The Hospital’s motion to preclude testimony regarding Helen Rosengrant’s personal feelings, (Doc. 65), is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as specified in the court’s memorandum. 5. The Hospital’s motion to preclude Rosengrant from testifying about the reasons for her resignation from the Hospital, (Doc. 67), is DENIED. 6. The Hospital’s motion to exclude witnesses, (Doc. 78), is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as specified in the court’s memorandum. s/ Malachy E. Mannion MALACHY E. MANNION United States District Judge Dated: July 6, 2016 O:\Mannion\shared\MEMORANDA - DJ\CIVIL MEMORANDA\2014 MEMORANDA\14-1062-03-Order.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?