Montanez v. Tritt et al

Filing 50

ORDER 1. Defendants' motion (Doc. 25) to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: a. Plaintiffs claims against Superintendent Brenda Tritt are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate Superintendent Brenda Tritt as a party to this action. b. The motion to dismiss the claims against Lieutenant Joseph Hannon and Sergeant Reed is DENIED. c. Plaintiffs claims against the Defendants in their official capacities are DISMISSED. 2. Defendants Hannon and Reed are directed to file a responsive pleading within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 9/21/15. (jfg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSE MONTANEZ, Plaintiff, Civil No. 3:14-cv-1362 v. (Judge Mariani) MS. TRITT, et a/., Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this ;;u:>t;;y of September, 2015, upon consideration of Defendants' motion (Doc. 25) to dismiss, and for the reasons set forth in the Court's Memorandum of the same date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants' motion (Doc. 25) to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: a. b. The motion to dismiss the claims against Lieutenant Joseph Hannon and Sergeant Reed is DENIED. c. 2. Plaintiffs claims against Superintendent Brenda Tritt are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate Superintendent Brenda Tritt as a party to this action. Plaintiffs claims against the Defendants in their official capacities are DISMISSED. Defendants Hannon and Reed are directed to file a responsive pleading within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?