Simmons v Ebbert
Filing
22
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry); OVERRULING the objections to the R&R; ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of Magistrate Judge Mehalchick; DENYING petitioner's motion for Summary Judgment 11 ; DISMISSING the petition for writ of habeas corpus; Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 4/18/16. (sm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ROOSEVELT SIMMONS,
Petitioner
:
No. 3:14cv1422
:
:
(Judge Munley)
v.
:
:
(Magistrate Judge Mehalchick)
DAVID J. EBBERT,
:
Respondent
:
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
ORDER
AND NOW, to wit, this 18th day of April 2016, it is hereby
ORDERED:
1) Petitioner’s objections (Doc. 18) to Magistrate Judge Mehalchick’s
Report & Recommendation (hereinafter “R&R”) (Doc. 15) are
OVERRULED;
2) Magistrate Judge Mehalchick’s R&R is hereby ADOPTED, and
Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED;
3) Petitioner’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 11) is DENIED;
and
4) The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
BY THE COURT:
s/ James M. Munley
JUDGE JAMES M. MUNLEY
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?