Vnuk v. Berwick Hospital Company, LLC et al

Filing 30

ORDER 1. Defendant John's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8) is DENIED. 2.Defendant Berwick Hospital's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 11) is GRANTED.3. Count Eight of Plaintiffs Amended Complaint is DISMISSED against Berwick Hospital only. 4. When Plainti ff receives the Notice of Right to Sue referenced on page 7, footnote 1of her Amended Complaint, she may file a motion for leave to amend her Complaint asecond time to include the information subject to the Notice of Right to Sue and to correct the deficiencies discussed in the Court's accompanying Memorandum Opinion.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 8/19/15. (jfg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANGELA VNUK, Plaintiff, v. 3:14·CV·01432 (JUDGE MARIANI) BERWICK HOSPITAL CO. and MALlYAKKAL J. JOHN, Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, THIS I~ DAY OF AUGUST, 2015, upon consideration of Defendants Maliyakkal John and Berwick Hospital's respective Motions to Dismiss, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendant John's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8) is DENIED. 2. Defendant Berwick Hospital's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 11) is GRANTED. 3. Count Eight of Plaintiffs Amended Complaint is DISMISSED against Berwick Hospital only. 4. When Plaintiff receives the Notice of Right to Sue referenced on page 7, footnote 1of her Amended Complaint, she may file a motion for leave to amend her Complaint a second time to include the information subject to the Notice of Right to Sue and to correct the deficiencies discussed in the Court's accompanying Memorandum Opinion. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?