Mutschler v. Tritt et al

Filing 33

ORDER denying 26 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; striking 27 Motion for Discovery; granting 29 Motion to Stay. 1. Plaintiffs motion for counsel (Doc. 26) is DENIED WITHOUTPREJUDICE; 2.The Clerk of Court is directed to STRIKE FROM THE RECORDAND R ETURN TO PLAINTIFF his filing of October 29, 2014,entitled Petition in Supplement Complaint (Doc. 14) and his Motionfor Discovery (Doc. 27); and 3.Defendants motion to stay discovery (Doc. 29) is GRANTED. Alldiscovery in this case is stayed pending resolution of Defendants motionto dismiss the complaint. Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 7/16/2015 (bg)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TONY L. MUTSCHLER, Plaintiff, v. BRENDA L. TRITT, et al., Defendants. : : : : : CIVIL NO. 3:CV-14-1611 : : (Judge Kosik) : : ORDER AND NOW, THIS 16th DAY OF JULY, 2015, in accordance with the Memorandum issued this day, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Plaintiff’s motion for counsel (Doc. 26) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to STRIKE FROM THE RECORD AND RETURN TO PLAINTIFF his filing of October 29, 2014, entitled “Petition in Supplement Complaint” (Doc. 14) and his Motion for Discovery (Doc. 27); and 3. Defendants’ motion to stay discovery (Doc. 29) is GRANTED. All discovery in this case is stayed pending resolution of Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint. s/Edwin M. Kosik EDWIN M. KOSIK United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?