Brogan v. Tunkhannock Township et al

Filing 53

ORDER upon consideration of the "Consolidated Motion of Defendant, James Sebolka, Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6) and 12(e) Seeking to Strike Off Plaintiffs Complaint or, in the Alternative, for a More Definite Statement" (Doc. 10), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Defendant Sebolka's motion is DENIED.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 8/19/15. (jfg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PATRICK BROGAN

Plaintiff,

v.

3:14·CV·1690
(JUDGE MARIANI)

TUNKHANNOCK TOWNSHIP, et al.
Defendants.
ORDER

AND NOW, THIS -1f-1AY OF AUGUST 2015, upon consideration of the
"Consolidated Motion of Defendant, James Sebolka, Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6) and
12(e) Seeking to Strike Off Plaintiffs Complaint or, in the Alternative, for a More Definite
Statement" (Doc. 10), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Defendant Sebolka's motion is

DENIED.

•

obert . Mariani
United States District Court Judge