Anderson v. Bickell et al

Filing 79

ORDER granting 67 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 69 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 72 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The Amended Complaint (Doc. 64) is DISMISSED. The Supplemental Complaint (Doc. 64-1) is DISMISSED. Clerk of Court directed to CLOSE this case. Any appeal from this Order will be deemed frivolous, lacking merit, and not taken in good faith. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 2/28/17 (jam)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RODNEY ANDERSON, Plaintiff v. T. BICKELL, et al., Defendants : : : : : : : : : CIVIL NO. 3:CV-14-1792 (Judge Caputo) ORDER AND NOW, this 28th day of FEBRUARY, 2017, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED that: 1. The DOC Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 67) is GRANTED. 2. The DOC Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Supplemental Complaint (ECF No. 69) is GRANTED. 3. Ms. Parkes’ Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 72) is GRANTED. 4. The Amended Complaint (ECF No. 64) is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). 5. The Supplemental Complaint (ECF No. 64-1) is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). 6. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 7. Any appeal from this Order will be deemed frivolous, lacking merit, and not taken in good faith. /s/ A. Richard Caputo A. RICHARD CAPUTO United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?