Anderson v. Bickell et al
Filing
79
ORDER granting 67 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 69 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 72 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The Amended Complaint (Doc. 64) is DISMISSED. The Supplemental Complaint (Doc. 64-1) is DISMISSED. Clerk of Court directed to CLOSE this case. Any appeal from this Order will be deemed frivolous, lacking merit, and not taken in good faith. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 2/28/17 (jam)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RODNEY ANDERSON,
Plaintiff
v.
T. BICKELL, et al.,
Defendants
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL NO. 3:CV-14-1792
(Judge Caputo)
ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of FEBRUARY, 2017, in accordance with the
accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED that:
1.
The DOC Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Amended
Complaint (ECF No. 67) is GRANTED.
2.
The DOC Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the
Supplemental Complaint (ECF No. 69) is GRANTED.
3.
Ms. Parkes’ Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint
(ECF No. 72) is GRANTED.
4.
The Amended Complaint (ECF No. 64) is DISMISSED
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).
5.
The Supplemental Complaint (ECF No. 64-1) is
DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).
6.
The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
7.
Any appeal from this Order will be deemed frivolous,
lacking merit, and not taken in good faith.
/s/ A. Richard Caputo
A. RICHARD CAPUTO
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?