Clark-Aigner v. Ebbert

Filing 9

ORDER DISMISSING CASE (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). 1. Petitioners application to proceed in forma pauperis, (Doc. 4), is GRANTED for the sole purpose of filing this action. 2. Plaintiffs Motion to Appoint Counsel, (Doc. 6 ), is DISMISSED AS MOOT. 3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, (Doc. 1, petition), is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.Signed by Honorable William J. Nealon on 2/13/2015. (bg)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GABRIEL CLARK-AIGNER,
Petitioner
v.
WARDEN EBBERT,
Respondent

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

No. 3:14-cv-2012
(Judge Nealon)

ORDER
AND NOW, THIS 13th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2015, for the reasons set
forth in the Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1.

Petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, (Doc. 4), is
GRANTED for the sole purpose of filing this action.

2.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint Counsel, (Doc. 6), is DISMISSED AS
MOOT.

3.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241,
(Doc. 1, petition), is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

4.

The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

/s/ William J. Nealon
United States District Judge