Antonelli et al v. Sapa Extrusions Inc.

Filing 12

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), GRANTING 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM to the extent that Pltf Matthew Daniel's claims are dismissed w/o prejudice to pltfs filing an amended complaint w/i 14 days; if no amended complaint is filed, pltf Daniel's claims will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 1/27/15. (sm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ELAINA ANTONELLI and MATTHEW DANIELS, Plaintiffs : No. 3:14cv2184 : : (Judge Munley) : v. : : SAPA EXTRUSIONS INC., : Defendant : ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ORDER AND NOW, to wit, this 27th day of January 2015, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Sapa Extrusions Inc.’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 5) is GRANTED to the extent that Plaintiff Matthew Daniels’s claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to plaintiffs filing an amended complaint within fourteen (14) days to properly assert these claims. If no amended complaint is filed after fourteen (14) days, Plaintiff Daniels’s claims will be dismissed with prejudice. s/ James M. Munley JUDGE JAMES M. MUNLEY United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?