Bradley v. Bank of America et al

Filing 11

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) Appellant John Bradleys appeal 1 of Bankruptcy Judge John J. Thomass Abstention Order Doc. [1-3] and Sanctions Orders Docs. [1-1 & 1-2], and all relevant documents, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Appellant John Bradleys Appeal is DENIED; The Bankruptcy Courts decision to permissively abstain (Doc. 1-3; Case No. 5:13-ap-00247 at Doc. 91) is AFFIRMED; The Bankruptcy Courts Orders (Docs. 1-1 & 1-2) denying Appellants Order to Show Cause f or Sanctions (Case No. 5:13-ap-00247 at Doc. 25) and Motion for Contempt Sanctions (Case No. 5:13-ap-00247 at Doc. 70) are AFFIRMED; The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE Case Number 3:14-CV-02500. Signed by Honorable Robert D Mariani on 4/1/2024. (cac)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVNAIA : Adversary Proceeding : 5:13-ap-00247 In re: JOHN BRADLEY JR, Debtor. JOHN BRADLEY JR, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14-cv-02500 : (JUDGE MARIANI) : (APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT) Appellant, V. BANK OF AMERICAN.A.; BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING LP; NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, Appellee(s). _-- ORDER AND NOW, THIS /Sz DAY OF APRIL 2024, upon consideration of Appellant John Bradley's appeal (Doc. 1) of Bankruptcy Judge John J. Thomas's Abstention Order (Doc. 1-3) and Sanctions Orders (Docs. 1-1 & 1-2) , and all relevant documents, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Appellant John Bradley's Appeal is DENIED; 2. The Bankruptcy Court's decision to permissively abstain (Doc. 1-3; Case No. 5:13-ap-00247 at Doc. 91) is AFFIRMED; 3. The Bankruptcy Court's Orders (Docs. 1-1 & 1-2) denying Appellant's "Order to Show Cause for Sanctions" (Case No. 5:13-ap-00247 at Doc. 25) and "Motion for Contempt Sanctions" (Case No. 5:13-ap-00247 at Doc. 70) are AFFIRMED; 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE Case Number 3:14-CV-02500. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?