Sabo v. REO Property Management, LLC

Filing 23

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)DENYING Doc. 4 Motion to Dismiss. After reviewing the motion to dismiss (Doc. 4) filed by the defendant and after review of the submissions of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:1 .The motion to dismiss is hereby DENIED;2.The motion requesting an order directing the plaintiff to file an amended complaint is hereby DENIED;3.The defendants motion seeking a sixty (60) day extension of time to file an answer to the complaint is hereby DENIED.4.The defendant shall file its answer within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order pursuant to F.R.Civ.P 12(a)(4)(A).Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 4/30/15. (ms)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ELIZABETH SABO,
Plaintiff,

:
:
:
v.
:
:
REO PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, :
LLC,
:
Defendant.
:

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:cv–15-0131

Magistrate Judge Saporito

ORDER
Now, this 30th day of April, 2015, after reviewing the motion to dismiss
(Doc. 4) filed by the defendant and after review of the submissions of the parties,
it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1.

The motion to dismiss is hereby DENIED;

2.

The motion requesting an order directing the plaintiff to file an
amended complaint is hereby DENIED;

3.

The defendant’s motion seeking a sixty (60) day extension of
time to file an answer to the complaint is hereby DENIED.

4.

The defendant shall file its answer within fourteen (14) days
from the date of this Order pursuant to F.R.Civ.P 12(a)(4)(A).
s/ Joseph F. Saporito, Jr.
JOSEPH F. SAPORITO, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge