Liptok et al v. Bank of America
Filing
86
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry); ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of Chief Magistrate Judge Carlson; Overruling the objections ; GRANTING dft's MOTION for Summary Judgment ; DENYING pltfs' MOTION to Dismiss ; Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of the dft and CLOSE this case.Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 11/16/16. (sm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOHN JOSEPH LIPTOK, et al.,
Plaintiffs
:
No. 3:15cv156
:
:
(Judge Munley)
v.
:
: (Chief Magistrate Judge Carlson)
BANK OF AMERICA,
:
Defendant
:
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
ORDER
AND NOW, to wit, this 16th day of November 2016, it is HEREBY
ORDERED as follows:
1. Plaintiffs’ objections to the Report and Recommendation
(hereinafter “R&R”) (Doc. 82) are OVERRULED;
2. The R&R of Chief Magistrate Judge Carlson (Doc. 81)
is ADOPTED;
3. Plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss defendant’s motion for
summary judgment (Doc. 78) is DENIED;
4. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 69) is
GRANTED;
5. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in
favor of Defendant; and
6. The Clerk of Court is further directed to close this case.
BY THE COURT:
s/ James M. Munley
JUDGE JAMES M. MUNLEY
United States District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?