Kisthardt v. Colbert et al

Filing 25

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). 1. Plaintiffs Motion for Extension of Time to File Pretrial Motions (Doc. 23) is construed to be a combined motion for extension of time to oppose Defendants motions to dismiss and motion for the appointment of counsel. 2. Plaintiffs motion for extension of time to oppose the motions to dismiss is granted. Plaintiff shall file his opposition briefs within forty-five (45) days from the date of this order. The failure to do so will re sult in the motions being deemed unopposed and addressed on the merits in accordance with M.D. Pa. Local Rule 7.6. 3. Plaintiffs motion for the appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 05/19/2015. (emksec, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JASON EDWARD KISTHARDT,
Plaintiff
v.
RON COLBERT, et al.,
Defendants

:
:
:
:
: CIVIL NO. 3:CV-15-0191
:
: (Judge Kosik)
:
:
ORDER

AND NOW, THIS 19th DAY OF MAY, 2015, in accordance with the
Memorandum issued this day, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
1.

Plaintiff’s “Motion for Extension of Time to File Pretrial
Motions” (Doc. 23) is construed to be a combined motion
for extension of time to oppose Defendants’ motions to
dismiss and motion for the appointment of counsel.

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time to oppose the
motions to dismiss is granted. Plaintiff shall file his
opposition briefs within forty-five (45) days from the date
of this order. The failure to do so will result in the motions
being deemed unopposed and addressed on the merits in
accordance with M.D. Pa. Local Rule 7.6.

3.

Plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of counsel is denied without
prejudice.

s/Edwin M. Kosik
EDWIN M. KOSIK
United States District Judge