Kapish v. Advanced Code Group et al

Filing 21

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), GRANTING in part DENYING in part 11 MOTION to Dismiss- granted re Counts II and III; and denied in all respects; Dfts to answer pltf's complaint w/i 14 days. Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 09/01/15. (sm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CHARLES KAPISH individually and t/d/b/a KAPS CONSTRUCTION, Plaintiff : No. 3:15cv278 : : (Judge Munley) : v. : : ADVANCED CODE GROUP, : JEFFREY REMAS and SHAWN : BOLLES, : Defendants : :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ORDER AND NOW, to wit, this 1st day of September 2015, defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 11) is hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: 1. The motion is GRANTED with respect to plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process claim, Count II, against the defendants. Count II is DISMISSED with prejudice; 2. The motion is GRANTED with respect to plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment procedural due process claim, Count III, against the defendants. Count III is DISMISSED with prejudice; and 3. The motion is DENIED in all other respects. 4. Defendants are further ORDERED to answer plaintiff’s complaint within fourteen (14) days. BY THE COURT: s/ James M. Munley JUDGE JAMES M. MUNLEY United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?