Peay v. Fisher et al

Filing 133

ORDER 1. The motions to compel discovery (Doc. 80, 84) are DENIED as follows:a. Plaintiffs request that the Court Order Defendants to bear the costs of discovery and compensate Plaintiff for the costs incurred in pursuing the discovery motions is DEN IED. b. Plaintiffs request that the Court Order Defendants to respond to interrogatories is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiffs right to reassert this request in the event that Defendants have not yet responded to the interrogatories. c. Plaintiff s request that the Court initiate criminal proceedings against Defendants is DENIED. d. Plaintiffs request for a"disposition hearing" is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for the reasons set forth in the Court's Orders dated July 1,2016 and July 12, 2016, see (Docs. 124, 128).Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 7/13/16. (jfg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

STRATTON PEAY,

Civil No. 3:15-cv-00345

Plaintiff

(Judge Mariani)

v.
SUPERINTENDENT J. FISHER, et al.,
Defendants

Htf1

AND NOW, this

ORDER

~ day of July, 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiffs

motions to compel discovery (Docs. 80, 84), and for the reasons set forth in the Court's
Memorandum of the same date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1.

The motions to compel discovery (Doc. 80, 84) are DENIED as follows:
a.

Plaintiffs request that the Court Order Defendants to bear the costs of
discovery and compensate Plaintiff for the costs incurred in pursuing
the discovery motions is DENIED.

b.

Plaintiffs request that the Court Order Defendants to respond to
interrogatories is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiffs right to
reassert this request in the event that Defendants have not yet
responded to the interrogatories.

c.

Plaintiffs request that the Court initiate criminal proceedings against
Defendants is DENIED.

d.

Plaintiffs request for a "disposition hearing" is DENIED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE for the reasons set forth in the Court's Orders dated July

1,2016 and July 12, 2016,

see (Docs. 124, 128).1

I

The Court previously denied similar requests and granted Plaintiff the opportunity to identify
any Oefendant(s) whom he wished to depose. (Doc. 124, ,-r 3; Doc. 128, ,-r 1).

2