Peay v. Fisher et al

Filing 53

ORDER 1. Plaintiffs "Motion[s] for Order that Defendants File Reply", and Plaintiffs request for sanctions, (Docs. 30, 31), are DENIED. 2. Plaintiffs Motion for Relief in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c)(1 )-(4) is DENIED. (Doc. 40).Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 11/2/15. (jfg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

STRATTON PEAY,
Plaintiff

Civil No. 3:15-cv-00345

v.

(Judge Mariani)

SUPERINTENDENT J. FISHER, et al.,
Defendants

ORDER
AND NOW, this

~day of November, 2015, for the reasons set forth in the

Memorandum of the same date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1.

Plaintiffs "Motion[s] for Order that Defendants File Reply", and Plaintiffs
request for sanctions, (Docs. 30, 31), are DENIED.

2.

Plaintiffs Motion for Relief in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
56(c)(1 )-(4) is DENIED. (Doc. 40).