Woodley v. Kerestes et al

Filing 16

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), DENYING petition for writ of habeas corpus; There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability; Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 5/31/17. (sm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KEVIN A. WOODLEY, : : Petitioner : : v. : : JOHN KERESTES, et al., : : Respondents : CIVIL NO. 3:15-cv-0498 (Judge Munley) :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ORDER AND NOW, to wit, this 31st day of May 2017, upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), and in accordance with the Court’s Memorandum of the same date, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. 2. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. See R. GOVERNING § 2254 CASES R. 11(a) (stating that “[t]he district court must issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to the applicant”). 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. BY THE COURT: s/James M. Munley JUDGE JAMES M. MUNLEY United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?