Urena v. Allstate Insurance Company et al

Filing 22

ORDER 1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Count II (Bad Faith) of Plaintiffs Complaint is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, specifically, a. The Motion to Dismiss Count II is granted as to paragraph 58(a)-(d) and (h) of the Complaint (Doc. 1). b. The Motion to Dismiss Count II is denied with respect to the remaining allegations pertaining to Plaintiffs Bad Faith claim.2. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss COllnt III (Unfair Trade Practice &Consumer Protection Law) of Plaintiffs Complaint is DENIED AS MOOT.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 3/14/16. (jfg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BERKYS URENA,
Plaintiff,

v.
3:15·CV·570
(JUDGE MARIANI)

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
and ALLSTATE FIRE CASUALTV
INSURANCE COMPANY

f

!
r

r

r

Defendants.

I

I
i
f

ORDER
AND NOW, THIS 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 2016, upon consideration of Defendants
Allstate Insurance Company and Allstate Fire &Casualty Insurance Company's Motion to
Dismiss (Doc. 11), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is
GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, to wit:
1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Count II (Bad Faith) of Plaintiffs Complaint is

GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, specifically,

a. The Motion to Dismiss Count II is granted as to paragraph 58(a)-(d) and (h) of
the Complaint (Doc. 1).
b. The Motion to Dismiss Count II is denied with respect to the remaining

allegations pertaining to Plaintiffs Bad Faith claim.

2. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss COllnt III (Unfair Trade Practice & Consumer Protection

Law) of Plaintiffs Complaint is DENIED AS MO~Q-.--.