Upshaw v. Ebbert

Filing 18

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)- IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Petitioners Independent Action to Obtain Relief from Judgment or Order Pursuant to Rule 60 of Federal Rules of Civ. P., (Doc. 15), is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction; and 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this matter.Signed by Honorable William J. Nealon on 08/28/17. (pjr)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TERRENCE UPSHAW,
Petitioner
v.
D. EBBERT, WARDEN,
Respondent

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-CV-0658
(Judge Nealon)

ORDER
AND NOW, THIS 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2017, upon consideration of
the Memorandum issued this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1.

Petitioner’s “Independent Action to Obtain Relief from Judgment or
Order Pursuant to Rule 60 of Federal Rules of Civ. P.,” (Doc. 15), is
DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction; and

2.

The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this matter.

/s/ William J. Nealon
United States District Judge