Porter v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
Filing
24
ORDER - THAT Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 4) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, to wit: 1. Plaintiffs claim for attorney's fees in Count I is STRICKEN, but Plaintiffs claim for attorney's fees under Count II is PRESERVED.2. Plaintiffs allegations in paragraphs 54 through 62 of the Complaint are deemed to be asserted in support of Count I. 3. Plaintiffs claim for compensatory damages in Count" is properly asserted under Count I.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 2/8/16. (jfg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ANDREW PORTER,
Plaintiff,
v.
3:15·CV·759
(JUDGE MARIANI)
SAFECOINSURANCE
COMPANY OF ILLINOIS,
Defendant.
ORDER
AND NOW, THIS 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2016, upon consideration of
Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 4) and the accompanying briefs in support thereof
(Doc. 4, Ex. 3; Doc. 7), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendant's Motion to Dismiss
(Doc. 4) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, to wit:
1. Plaintiffs claim for attorney's fees in Count I is STRICKEN, but Plaintiffs claim for
attorney's fees under Count II is PRESERVED.
2. Plaintiffs allegations in paragraphs 54 through 62 of the Complaint are deemed to be
asserted in support of Count I.
3. Plaintiffs claim for compensatory damages in Count" is properly asserted under
Count I.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?