Porter v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois

Filing 24

ORDER - THAT Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 4) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, to wit: 1. Plaintiffs claim for attorney's fees in Count I is STRICKEN, but Plaintiffs claim for attorney's fees under Count II is PRESERVED.2. Plaintiffs allegations in paragraphs 54 through 62 of the Complaint are deemed to be asserted in support of Count I. 3. Plaintiffs claim for compensatory damages in Count" is properly asserted under Count I.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 2/8/16. (jfg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANDREW PORTER, Plaintiff, v. 3:15·CV·759 (JUDGE MARIANI) SAFECOINSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, Defendant. ORDER AND NOW, THIS 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2016, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 4) and the accompanying briefs in support thereof (Doc. 4, Ex. 3; Doc. 7), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 4) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, to wit: 1. Plaintiffs claim for attorney's fees in Count I is STRICKEN, but Plaintiffs claim for attorney's fees under Count II is PRESERVED. 2. Plaintiffs allegations in paragraphs 54 through 62 of the Complaint are deemed to be asserted in support of Count I. 3. Plaintiffs claim for compensatory damages in Count" is properly asserted under Count I.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?