Saranchuk et al v. Lello et al
Filing
37
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) that the motion for summary jgm is granted in part and denied in part. (See order for details).Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 10/13/17. (bs)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOHN SARANCHUK, et al.,
Plaintiffs
v.
DAN LELLO, et al.,
Defendants
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-0893
(JUDGE MANNION)
ORDER
In accordance with the accompanying memorandum issued this same day,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the defendants’ motion for summary
judgment, (Doc. 30), is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as
follows:
(1)
the defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED with
respect to the Fifth Amendment claims (Count I of the complaint),
Sixth Amendment claims (Count I), substantive due process claims
(Count I), civil rights conspiracy claims (Count II), equal protection
claims (Count III), official capacity claims, intentional infliction of
emotional distress claims (Count VI), claims for breach of the implied
covenant of good faith and fair dealing (Count VII), claims for
intentional interference with advantageous relations (Counts VIII and
IX), abuse of process claims (Count X), defamation claims (Count
XI), civil conspiracy claims (Count V), and loss of consortium claims
(Count XII); and
(2)
the defendants’ motion for summary judgment is DENIED with
respect to the procedural due process claims (Count I of the
complaint), Monell liability claims (Count IV), and the affirmative
defense of qualified immunity.
s/ Malachy E. Mannion
MALACHY E. MANNION
United States District Judge
Date: October 13, 2017
O:\Mannion\shared\MEMORANDA - DJ\CIVIL MEMORANDA\2015 MEMORANDA\15-0893-01-Order.docx
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?