Castillo v. All Jane Does of Postal Deputies et al

Filing 13

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - 12 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED AS AMENDED: (1) Counts I, II, III, IV, V, and VI of Plaintiff Mickey Castillos Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 11) are DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction;(2) All remaining Counts of Plaintiff Mickey Castillos Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 11) are DISMISSED with prejudice;(3) The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case as CLOSED.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 12/19/17. (dw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICKEY CASTILLO, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-CV-00910 Plaintiff, v. ALL JANE/JOHN DOES OF DEPUTIZED POSTAL OFFICERS AT ALL FACILITIES PLAINTIFF WAS INCARCERATED, et. al., (JUDGE CAPUTO) (MAGISTRATE JUDGE MEHALCHICK) Defendants. ORDER NOW, this 19th day of December, 2017, upon review of the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of Magistrate Judge Mehalchick (Doc. 12) for plain error or manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Mehalchick’s R&R is ADOPTED as amended below: (1) Counts I, II, III, IV, V, and VI of Plaintiff Mickey Castillo’s Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 11) are DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction; (2) All remaining Counts of Plaintiff Mickey Castillo’s Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 11) are DISMISSED with prejudice; (3) The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case as CLOSED. /s/ A. Richard Caputo A. Richard Caputo United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?