Castillo v. All Jane Does of Postal Deputies et al
Filing
13
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - 12 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED AS AMENDED: (1) Counts I, II, III, IV, V, and VI of Plaintiff Mickey Castillos Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 11) are DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction;(2) All remaining Counts of Plaintiff Mickey Castillos Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 11) are DISMISSED with prejudice;(3) The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case as CLOSED.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 12/19/17. (dw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MICKEY CASTILLO,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-CV-00910
Plaintiff,
v.
ALL JANE/JOHN DOES OF DEPUTIZED
POSTAL OFFICERS AT ALL
FACILITIES PLAINTIFF WAS
INCARCERATED, et. al.,
(JUDGE CAPUTO)
(MAGISTRATE JUDGE
MEHALCHICK)
Defendants.
ORDER
NOW, this 19th day of December, 2017, upon review of the Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) of Magistrate Judge Mehalchick (Doc. 12) for plain error or
manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Mehalchick’s R&R is
ADOPTED as amended below:
(1)
Counts I, II, III, IV, V, and VI of Plaintiff Mickey Castillo’s Second Amended
Complaint (Doc. 11) are DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction;
(2)
All remaining Counts of Plaintiff Mickey Castillo’s Second Amended Complaint
(Doc. 11) are DISMISSED with prejudice;
(3)
The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case as CLOSED.
/s/ A. Richard Caputo
A. Richard Caputo
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?