Njos v. United States Of America

Filing 79

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 42 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery and enlarge Discovery deadlines; denying 47 Plaintiff's Motion to Clarify; denying 57 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment; and, denying as moot 33 Plaintiffs motion to take written depositions. Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 2/1/2017 (emksec, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SCOTT J. NJOS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : CIVIL NO. 3:15-CV-931 (Judge Kosik) ORDER NOW, THIS 1st DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2017, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff’s motion to take written depositions (Doc. 33) is DENIED as moot. Plaintiff is given thirty (30) days to demonstrate to the court how he will meet the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 31 in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum. If Plaintiff is unable to do so, discovery is enlarged for a period of sixty (60) days from today’s date to permit Plaintiff to serve interrogatory questions upon Defendant, and for Defendant to respond thereto. 2. Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery and enlarge the discovery deadline (Doc. 42) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is GRANTED to the extent that discovery is enlarged for a period of sixty (60) days to allow Plaintiff to properly serve his Request for Admissions and Request for Production of Documents upon Defendant within thirty (30) days, and receive responses thereto within the next thirty (30) days. This must be the same Requests filed with the court, and cannot be supplemented by Plaintiff. The motion is DENIED in all other respects. 3. Plaintiff’s motion for clarification (Doc. 47) is DENIED. 4. Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment (Doc. 57) is DENIED. s/Edwin M. Kosik EDWIN M. KOSIK United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?