Abu-Jamal et al v. Kerestes et al

Filing 158

ORDER upon consideration of Defendants Lisiak, Khanum, and Saxon's "Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint" (Doc. 110), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT said Motion is DENIED.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 6/22/16. (jfg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MUMIA ABU-JAMAL, et aI., Plaintiffs, v. 3: 1S-CV-00967 (JUDGE MARIANI) JOHN KERESTES, et al. Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, THIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2016, upon consideration of Defendants Lisiak, Khanum, and Saxon's "Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint" (Doc. 110), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT said Motion is DENIED.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?