Abu-Jamal et al v. Kerestes et al

Filing 192

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). Plaintiffs Objections (Doc. 42) are OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 39) is OVERRULED. Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 23) is DENIED. Plaintiffs "Motion to Supplement Record of Motion for Preliminary Injunction" (Doc. 186) is DENIED AS MOOT.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 8/31/2016. (bg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MUMIA ABU-JAMAL, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

v.

3:1S-CV-00967
(JUDGE MARIANI)

JOHN KERESTES, et al.
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, THIS 31ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiffs
"Motion for Preliminary Injunction" (Doc. 23), the December 2015 evidentiary hearing on
said Motion and subsequent supplementation of the evidentiary record, and all supporting
and opposing briefs and documentation, and upon de novo review of Magistrate Judge
Mehalchik's Report & Recommendation (Doc. 39) on the Motion for Preliminary Injunction,
and Plaintiffs Objections thereto (Doc. 42), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. Plaintiffs Objections (Doc. 42) are OVERRULED.
2. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 39) is OVERRULED.
3. Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 23) is DENIED.
4. Plaintiffs "Motion to Supplement Record of Motion for Preliminary Injunction"
(Doc. 186) is DENIED AS MOOT.