McCausin v. Eckard et al

Filing 6

ORDER granting 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting 2 Motion to Stay.1. Petitioners motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis(Doc. 3) is granted.2. Petitioners request that disposition of his pending habeascorpus petiti on be stayed (Doc. 2) is granted.3. Adjudication of Petitioners federal habeas corpus action isstayed.4. Within thirty (30) days of the termination of his state courtproceedings, Petitioner is directed to file a written statusreport with this court d etailing the conclusion of hisPennsylvania state court exhaustion efforts and including acopy of the relevant Superior and/or Supreme Courtsdisposition.5. For administrative purposes only, the Clerk of Court isdirected to mark this matter closed.Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 5/27/2015 (bg)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DONALD J. McCAUSLIN, Petitioner v. SUPERINTENDENT J. ECKARD, Respondent : : : : : CIVIL NO. 3:CV-15-0982 : : (Judge Kosik) : : ORDER AND NOW, THIS 27th DAY OF MAY, 2015, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Petitioner’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 3) is granted. 2. Petitioner’s request that disposition of his pending habeas corpus petition be stayed (Doc. 2) is granted. 3. Adjudication of Petitioner’s federal habeas corpus action is stayed. 4. Within thirty (30) days of the termination of his state court proceedings, Petitioner is directed to file a written status report with this court detailing the conclusion of his Pennsylvania state court exhaustion efforts and including a copy of the relevant Superior and/or Supreme Court’s disposition. 5. For administrative purposes only, the Clerk of Court is directed to mark this matter closed. s/Edwin M. Kosik EDWIN M. KOSIK United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?