Pino v. Carey et al

Filing 76

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) re 69 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 69 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re Objections to R&R due by ptlf by 9/18/2017. Response by defts due 9/25/17.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 9/5/17. (bs)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN A. PINO, : Plaintiff : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-1172 v. : MICHAEL CAREY, et al., Defendants (MANNION, D.J.) (CARLSON, M.J.) : : ORDER Based on the foregoing memorandum, plaintiff’s “MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME AND/OR AN ABEYANCE”, (Doc. 72), is DENIED to the extent that it requests the court to place his case in abeyance. Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED to the extent that it seeks a second extension of time to file objections to Judge Carlson’s Doc. 69 report. The plaintiff is directed to file his objections on or before September 18, 2017. Defendant Carey is directed to file any response to plaintiff’s objections on or before September 25, 2017. s/ Malachy E. Mannion MALACHY E. MANNION United States District Judge Dated: September 5, 2017 O:\Mannion\shared\MEMORANDA - DJ\CIVIL MEMORANDA\2015 MEMORANDA\15-1172-04-Order.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?