Pino v. Carey et al
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) re 69 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 69 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re Objections to R&R due by ptlf by 9/18/2017. Response by defts due 9/25/17.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 9/5/17. (bs)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOHN A. PINO,
: CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-1172
MICHAEL CAREY, et al.,
Based on the foregoing memorandum, plaintiff’s “MOTION FOR AN
EXTENSION OF TIME AND/OR AN ABEYANCE”, (Doc. 72), is DENIED to the
extent that it requests the court to place his case in abeyance. Plaintiff’s
motion is GRANTED to the extent that it seeks a second extension of time to
file objections to Judge Carlson’s Doc. 69 report. The plaintiff is directed to file
his objections on or before September 18, 2017. Defendant Carey is directed
to file any response to plaintiff’s objections on or before September 25, 2017.
s/ Malachy E. Mannion
MALACHY E. MANNION
United States District Judge
Dated: September 5, 2017
O:\Mannion\shared\MEMORANDA - DJ\CIVIL MEMORANDA\2015 MEMORANDA\15-1172-04-Order.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?