Pino v. Carey et al

Filing 83

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), (1)Judge Carlsons report and recommendation, (Doc. 69), is ADOPTED in its entirety;(2)the motion for summary judgment of defendant Carey, (Doc. 41), regarding the excessive force claim aga inst him raised in the plaintiffs amended complaint, (Doc. 9), is GRANTED;(3)plaintiffs objections to Judge Carlsons report, (Doc. 79), areOVERRULED;(4)the Clerk is directed to enter JUDGMENT in favor of defendant Carey, and against plaintiff Pino; and ORDER TERMINATING CASE.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 12/8/17. (bs)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN A. PINO, : Plaintiff : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-1172 v. : MICHAEL CAREY, et al., (MANNION, D.J.) (CARLSON, M.J.) : Defendants : ORDER As set forth in the memorandum issued this same day, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (1) Judge Carlson’s report and recommendation, (Doc. 69), is ADOPTED in its entirety; (2) the motion for summary judgment of defendant Carey, (Doc. 41), regarding the excessive force claim against him raised in the plaintiff’s amended complaint, (Doc. 9), is GRANTED; (3) plaintiff’s objections to Judge Carlson’s report, (Doc. 79), are OVERRULED; (4) the Clerk is directed to enter JUDGMENT in favor of defendant Carey, and against plaintiff Pino; and (5) the Clerk is also directed to CLOSE this case. s/ Malachy E. Mannion MALACHY E. MANNION United States District Judge Dated: December 8, 2017 O:\Mannion\shared\MEMORANDA - DJ\CIVIL MEMORANDA\2015 MEMORANDA\15-1172-05-ORDER.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?