Schreane v. Marr et al

Filing 73

ORDER denying as moot 34 Motion for Declaratory Judgment; denying 52 Motion to Extend Time; denying 69 Motion for Order; granting 21 Motion for Summary Judgment. Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants Robert M arr, B Chambers, T. Lynn, Mr. Diltz, D. Olsheskie and Sarah Dees and against Plaintiff, Clarence D. Schreane. Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this file. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 4/3/17 (jam) Modified on 4/3/2017 (jam). (Main Document 73 replaced on 4/3/2017) (jam).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CLARENCE D. SCHREANE, Plaintiff v. ROBERT MARR, et al., Defendants : : : : : : : : : CIVIL NO. 3:CV-15-1204 (Judge Caputo) ORDER AND NOW, this 3rd day of APRIL, 2017, upon consideration of Defendants’ to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 21) it is ORDERED that: 1. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 21) is GRANTED. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants Robert Marr; B. Chambers; T. Lynn; Mr. Diltz; D. Olsheskie and Sarah Dees, and against Plaintiff, Clarence D. Schreane. 3. Based on the Court’s decision, Mr. Schreane’s pending motions for Motion for Declaratory Judgment (ECF No. 34), Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. 52) and Motion for Order (ECF No. 69) are DENIED as moot. 4. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this file. /s/ A. Richard Caputo A. RICHARD CAPUTO United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?