RITTER v. TUTTLE et al

Filing 46

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry); Overruling the Objections; ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of Magistrate Judge Carlson; declining to issue a certificate of appealability; Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 12/14/18. (sm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WILLIAM S. RITTER, JR., Petitioner : No. 3:15cv1235 : : (Judge Munley) v. : :(Magistrate Judge Carlson) JOHN TUTTLE, et al., : Respondents : :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ORDER AND NOW, to wit, this 14th day of December 2018, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1) The petitioner’s objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (Doc. 44) are OVERRULED; 2) The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (Doc. 43) is ADOPTED in that William S. Ritter, Jr.’s habeas corpus petition is DENIED; 3) For the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, we decline to issue a certificate of appealability; and 4) The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. BY THE COURT: s/ James M. Munley JUDGE JAMES M. MUNLEY United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?