Hudson v. Carberry et al

Filing 47

ORDER 1. The motion (Doc. 33) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.2. The motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiffs request for responses toInterrogatories 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10,11,12,13 and 14 directed to Defendant Killeen and Defendant Killeen is directed to answer these interrogatories int accordance with the instructions set forth in the Memorandum accompanyingthis Order. 3. The motion is DENIED in all other respects.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 1/5/17. (jfg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Civil No. 3:15-cv-1282 KENDALL HUDSON, Plaintiff, t (Judge Mariani) I v. ! CARBERRY, et al., ~ Defendants ORDER AND NOW, this ~day of January, 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiffs motion to compel discovery (Doc. 33), and for the reasons set forth in the Court's I I ~ ! I Memorandum of the same date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The motion (Doc. 33) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. 2. The motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiffs request for responses to Interrogatories 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10,11,12,13 and 14 directed to Defendant Killeen and Defendant Killeen is directed to answer these interrogatories in accordance with the instructions set forth in the Memorandum accompanying this Order. 3. The motion is DENIED in all other resUl<ft"Tl"1"""­ I l f f t I [ l !. I ert D. Mariani ___ United States District Judge ! f J f i

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?