Elansari v. United States et al
Filing
75
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) (1)The report and recommendation of Judge Schwab, (Doc. 62), is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY;(2)The motions to dismiss plaintiff Elansaris complaint, (Doc. 1), ofCentre County Court of Common Pl eas and Columbia County Courthouse, (Doc. 14), the Columbia County District Attorneys Office, (Doc. 28), and the State College Police Department, (Doc. 36), are GRANTED and, the Moving defendants and Non-Moving defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE ; and(3)The Clerk of Court is directed to remand this case to Judge Schwab for further proceedings.re 46 56 59 54 51 50 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab; Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 8/17/16. (bs)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
AMRO ELANSARI,
:
:
Plaintiff
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-1461
:
v.
:
(MANNION, D.J.)
(SCHWAB, M.J.)
UNITED STATES, et al.,
:
Defendants
ORDER
Based on the foregoing Memorandum, and upon consideration of the
report and recommendation of Judge Susan E. Schwab, (Doc. 62), and the
plaintiff’s objections, (Doc. 63), and the responses thereto, (Doc. 65, Doc. 66),
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, THAT:
(1)
The report and recommendation of Judge Schwab, (Doc. 62), is
ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY;
(2)
The motions to dismiss plaintiff Elansari’s complaint, (Doc. 1), of
Centre County Court of Common Pleas and Columbia County
Courthouse, (Doc. 14), the Columbia County District Attorney’s
Office, (Doc. 28), and the State College Police Department, (Doc.
36), are GRANTED and, the Moving defendants and Non-Moving
defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and
(3)
The Clerk of Court is directed to remand this case to Judge
Schwab for further proceedings.
s/ Malachy E. Mannion
MALACHY E. MANNION
United States District Judge
Dated: August 17, 2016
O:\Mannion\shared\MEMORANDA - DJ\CIVIL MEMORANDA\2015 MEMORANDA\15-1461-01-ORDER.wpd
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?