Rollins v. Kerestes et al
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) There is simply no foundation to support a conclusion that the decision to deny parole was based on constitutionally impermissible reasons. Since Rollins' claim regarding the recission of his 2015 reparole application by the Parole Board does not rise to the level of a constitutional violation, his petition is subject to dismissal.Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 11/13/17. (cc)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
