Nunez et al v. Wolf et al
Filing
64
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). Motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint (Doc. 35) is Granted in part and Denied in part. Mr. Nunez's motion to join addional parties (Docs.3& 45) are DENIED. (See Order for complete details).Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 11/13/20. (ga)
Case 3:15-cv-01573-MEM-PT Document 64 Filed 11/13/20 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
FERNANDO NUNEZ,
Plaintiff
:
:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-1573
v.
:
TOM W. WOLF, et al.,
Defendants
(JUDGE MANNION)
:
ORDER
In accordance with the Memorandum issued this same day, it is
ORDERED that:
1.
Defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended
complaint (ECF No. 35) is granted in part and denied
in part.
2.
All claims against Governor Wolf are dismissed
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B).
3.
Defendants’ motion to dismiss Mr. Nunez’s RLUIPA
claims concerning the denial of an electric razor is
granted.
4.
Defendants’ motion to dismiss Mr. Nunez’s RLUIPA
claims concerning the denial of conjugal visitation,
congregational prayer during contact visits, and
religious circumcision surgery are denied at this time.
5.
Mr. Nunez’s motions to join additional parties and
claims and supplemental complaint (ECF Nos. 43
and 45) are denied.
Case 3:15-cv-01573-MEM-PT Document 64 Filed 11/13/20 Page 2 of 2
6.
Defendants Wetzel and Bickell shall file an Answer to
the remaining claims of the Amended Complaint
within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order.
s/ Malachy E. Mannion
MALACHY E. MANNION
United States District Judge
Dated: November 13, 2020
15-1573-01 ORDER
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?