Grant v. Colvin

Filing 21

ORDER 1. The Report and Recommendation, (Doc. 20), is ADOPTED for the reasons stated therein. 2. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiffs applications for benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act is V ACATED. 3. This case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security to conduct a new administrative hearing pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g). 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned case.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 4/3/17 (jfg)

Download PDF
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL GRANT Plaintiff, v. 3: 15·CV·01979 (JUDGE MARIANI) CAROLYN W. COLVIN, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECUIRTY Defendant. ORDER The background of this Order is as follows: on March 17,2017, Magistrate Judge Saporito issued a Report and Recommendation, (Doc. 20), in which he recommends that ~ this Court vacate the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiffs t application for benefits and remand this case to conduct a new administrative hearing. I I Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due on March 31,2017, and neither the Plaintiff nor the Defendant has filed an Objection to the Report and Recommendation. AND NOW, THIS ~ DAY OF APRIL, 2017, upon review of the Report and Recommendation for clear error or manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation, (Doc. 20), is ADOPTED for the reasons stated therein. t I 1 { I t I ~ ~ 2. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiffs applications for benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act is VACATED. 3. This case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security to conduct a new administrative hearing pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g). 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned case. obert D. Mariani United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?