Dolan et al v. PHL Variable Insurance Company et al

Filing 55

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part and denying in part 45 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part and denying in part 15 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiffs have 21 days to file an Amended Complaint; otherwise the Complaint will be dismissed with prejudice. See Order for specific details. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 11/22/16 (jam)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TIMOTHY DOLAN, et al., CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-cv-01987 Plaintiffs, (JUDGE CAPUTO) v. PHL VARIABLE INSURANCE CO., et al., Defendants. ORDER NOW, this 22 day of November, 2016, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 15, 33, 45) Plaintiffs’ Complaint (Doc. 1) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: (a) Count I alleging a violation of Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law ("UTPCPL"), 73 P.S. § 201 is DISMISSED without prejudice as failing to meet the particularity requirement of Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b). (b) Count II alleging a breach of fiduciary duty claim is DISMISSED without prejudice as failing to meet the particularity requirement of Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b). (c) Count III alleging a negligence claim is DISMISSED without prejudice as failing to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Plaintiffs have twenty-one (21) days from the date of entry of this Order to file a an Amended Complaint to properly plead their negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, and UTPCPL claims and to state their claims with respect to each Defendant insurance company with the requisite specificity; otherwise, those claims, and the Complaint, will be dismissed with prejudice. nd (1) (2) /s/ A. Richard Caputo A. Richard Caputo United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?