BROOKING v. D.O.C. AND EMPLOYEES AT SCI CAMP HILL et al

Filing 16

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). (1) The Report and Recommendation 13 is ADOPTED in part and REJECTED in part. (2) All claims except Plaintiff Marcus Brookings Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim are DISMISSED with prejudice. (3) This matter is RECOMMITTED to Magistrate Judge Saporito for further proceedings.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 1/29/19. (dw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MARCUS DION BROOKING,
NO. 3:15-CV-02134

Plaintiff,

(JUDGE CAPUTO)

v.
D.O.C., et al.,

(MAGISTRATE JUDGE SAPORITO)

Defendants.
ORDER
NOW, this 29th day of January, 2019, upon review of the Report and
Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Saporito (Doc. 13), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
(1)

The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 13) is ADOPTED in part and
REJECTED in part.

(2)

All claims except Plaintiff Marcus Brooking’s Eighth Amendment deliberate
indifference claim are DISMISSED with prejudice.

(3)

This matter is RECOMMITTED to Magistrate Judge Saporito for further
proceedings.

/s/ A. Richard Caputo
A. Richard Caputo
United States District Judge