Ciprich v. Luzerne County et al

Filing 53

ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 47) is ADOPTED. 2. Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. 50) are OVERRULED. 3. 42 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is GRANTED. 4. Case is DISMISSED. 5. Clerk of Court directed to CLOSE the above-captioned action.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 8/28/17. (jam)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BROOKE CIPRICH, Plaintiff, v. 3: 15-CV-02364 (JUDGE MARIANI) LUZERNE COUNTY, et al., Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, THIS 2J-8'-'1DAY OF AUGUST, 2017, upon de nova review of Magistrate Judge Carlson's Report and Recommendation (''R&R") (Doc. 47), Plaintiff's Objections thereto (Doc. 50), the "Motion of Defendant Luzerne County Children and Youth Services to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) or in the Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment" (Doc. 42), and all relevant briefs and submissions, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 47) is ADOPTED for the reasons stated therein as well as in this Court's accompanying memorandum opinion. 2. Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. 50), styled as an "Appeal" of the Magistrate Judge's R&R, are OVERRULED for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum opinion. 3. The "Motion of Defendant Luzerne County Children and Youth Services to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6)" (Doc. 42) is GRANTED. Defendants Luzerne County Children and Youth Services, JoAnn Costanzo, and Jamie Stuart are DISMISSED. 4. The Case is DISMISSED as to the remaining defendants, Frank Castano, Kayci Konopki, Tracy Schltz, Tricia Godshalk, and Brian Waugh, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) for failure to serve the above-listed defendants. 5. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned action. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?