Jackson v. Martinez et al
Filing
28
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), GRANTING dfts' moiton for summary judgment; Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of the dfts and CLOSE this case; any appeal from this order is deemed frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 3/2/17. (sm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PATRICK JACKSON,
v.
A. MARTINEZ, et al.,
:
Plaintiff
:
:
:
:
:
:
Defendants :
CIVIL NO. 3:15-cv-2394
(Judge Munley)
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
ORDER
AND NOW, to wit, this 2nd day of March 2017, upon consideration of defendants’
motion (Doc. 15) to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment pursuant to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 56, and for the reasons set forth in the Court’s Memorandum of this
date, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.
Defendants’ motion (Doc. 15) for summary judgment is GRANTED. The
Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment in favor of defendants and
against plaintiff.
2.
The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
3.
Any appeal from this order is DEEMED frivolous and not in good faith. See
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
BY THE COURT:
s/James M. Munley
JUDGE JAMES M. MUNLEY
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?