Keaton v. Maiorana

Filing 18

MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry).Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 6/15/17. (bs)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BRAD WAYNE KEATON
Petitioner
v.

:
:

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-2490

:
(JUDGE MANNION)

WARDEN MAIORANA
Respondent

:
:
MEMORANDUM

Brad Wayne Keaton, previously an inmate confined in the Canaan
United States Penitentiary, Waymart, Pennsylvania, filed this pro se petition for
writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2241. (Doc. 1). Keaton claims that
his due process rights were violated during the course of a prison disciplinary
hearing held on March 30, 2015, where he was found guilty of the prohibited act
of possession of unauthorized metal tools that were hidden underneath a chair.
Id. Specifically, he argues that the evidence is insufficient to show that he knew
these pieces of metal were underneath the chair he brought out of his cell only
an hour earlier. Id. For the reasons set forth below, the petition will be
dismissed as moot.
Background
On March 24, 2015, Keaton was served with Incident Report No.

2696738, charging him with possession, manufacture, or introduction of a gun,
firearm, weapon, sharpened instrument, knife, dangerous chemical, explosive,
ammunition, or any instrument used as a weapon, a code 104 violation. (Doc.
10-1 at 10). On March 24, 2015, the Unit Discipline Committee forwarded the
matter to the Discipline Hearing Officer (“DHO”). Id.
On March 30, 2015, Petitioner appeared before DHO Marc A. Renda,
for a disciplinary hearing. (Doc. 10-1 at 13-17). The DHO found Petitioner guilty
of the prohibited act and sanctioned Petitioner to, inter alia, disallowance of
forty (40) days good conduct time, and forfeiture of eighty-eight (88) days nonvested good conduct time. Id.
BOP records indicate that Keaton filed an appeal with the BOP Central
Office on June 15, 2015 and that the Central Office did not provide a response
to his appeal. Pursuant to 28 C.F.R. §542.18, the appeal is therefore deemed
to have been denied due to the Central Office’s lack of a timely response.
Accordingly, his challenge to the disciplinary action against him has been fully
exhausted.
On December 29, 2015, Keaton filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus
before this Court. ((Doc. 1). On February 12, 2016, Respondent filed his
response, and on March 31, 2016, Keaton filed a reply. (Doc. 14). On June 9,
2

2017, Keaton was released from custody. (Doc. 17-1).

Discussion
Article III of the United States Constitution limits federal courts to the
adjudication of only ongoing cases and controversies. U.S. Const. art. III, §2,
cl. 1. If at any time the petitioner does not have a “personal stake in the
outcome” of the suit, “the case must be dismissed as moot.” Blanciak v.
Allegheny Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir. 1996). “Once the
convict’s sentence has expired, some concrete and continuing injury other than
the new-ended incarceration or parole - some ‘collateral consequence’ of the
conviction - must exist if the suit is to be maintained.” Spencer v. Kemna, 523
U.S. 1, 7 (1998). Consequently, a petition under 28 U.S.C. §2241 challenging
the loss of good time credits becomes “moot upon [petitioner’s] release from
imprisonment unless he [or she] can demonstrate some ‘collateral
consequence’ that persists beyond the sentence’s expiration and is likely to be
redressed by a favorable judicial decision.” Scott v. Schuykill FCI, 298 F.App’x
202, 204 (3d Cir. 2008) (citing Spencer, 523 U.S. at 7)).
Keaton’s Inmate History reveals that he was released on good conduct
time. (Doc. 17-1). A search on the Federal Bureau of Prisons inmate locator
3

confirms that petitioner Brad Wayne Keaton, Register Number 17055-078, was
released from custody on June 9, 2017. Therefore, unless some collateral
consequence exists, his petition is now moot. Scott, 298 F.App’x at 204.
The record does not establish that any collateral consequences exist as
a result of Keaton’s prison disciplinary hearing. As Keaton has completed his
sentence, this Court can offer him no relief. Scott, 298 F. App’x at 204. Thus,
the petition for writ of habeas corpus is moot. Id.

Conclusion
A review of the record reveals that the Keaton’s petition for writ of
habeas corpus is moot. Consequently, the petition will be dismissed.
An appropriate Order will be entered.

s/ Malachy E. Mannion
MALACHY E. MANNION
United States District Judge

DATE: June 15, 2017
O:\Mannion\shared\MEMORANDA - DJ\CIVIL MEMORANDA\2015 MEMORANDA\15-2490-01.wpd

4