Canfield v. Statoil USA Onshore Properties INC et al

Filing 153

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)motion for preliminary approval of the parties settlement agreement and appointment of class representatives and class counsel, (Doc. 101), is GRANTED. (See order for details and deadlines).Final Approval Hearing set for 10/16/2020 10:30 AM in Scranton before Honorable Malachy E Mannion.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 7/8/20. (bs)

Download PDF
Case 3:16-cv-00085-MEM Document 153 Filed 07/08/20 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANGELO R. RESCIGNO, SR., AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF CHERYL B. CANFIELD, Plaintiff : : STATOIL USA ONSHORE PROPERTIES INC., CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-85 : v. : (JUDGE MANNION) : : Defendant ORDER In accordance with the memorandum issued this same day, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Rescigno’s motion for preliminary approval of the parties’ settlement agreement and appointment of class representatives and class counsel, (Doc. 101), is GRANTED as follows: (1) The class referenced in the parties’ settlement agreement, (Doc. 137), is preliminarily certified as a settlement class as follows: Royalty Owners in Northern Pennsylvania who have entered into oil and gas leases, regardless of the type of lease, that provide that the Royalty Owner is to be paid Royalties and to whom [SOP] has (or had) an obligation to pay Royalties on production attributable to [SOP]’s working interest. All named plaintiffs are preliminarily appointed as class representatives for the settlement class; Case 3:16-cv-00085-MEM Document 153 Filed 07/08/20 Page 2 of 3 (2) Robbins Gellar Rudman & Dowd LLP, The Clark Law Firm, P.C, and Chitwood Harley Harnes LLP are preliminarily approved as class counsel; (3) The settlement agreement, (Doc. 137), is preliminarily approved, subject to final approval at a final fairness hearing; (4) Gilardi & Co. LLC is preliminarily approved as the settlement administrator; (5) The proposed class notice form, attached to the settlement as Exhibit A-1, (Doc. 137-2), is approved and shall be sent out pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement; (6) The following schedule and procedures for completing the final approval process as set forth in the parties’ settlement agreement are hereby approved as follows: Deadline to mail notices (“the Notice Date”) Deadline to file motions in support of final approval of settlement, plan of administration, and any application(s) for attorneys’ fees and expenses Deadline to submit requests for inclusion or objection to settlement, plan of administration, and/or attorneys’ fees and expenses -2- Fourteen (14) calendar days after entry of the court’s preliminary approval order Thirty-five (35) calendar days prior to the final fairness hearing Twenty-one (21) calendar days prior to the final fairness hearing Case 3:16-cv-00085-MEM Document 153 Filed 07/08/20 Page 3 of 3 Class counsel to provide SOP copies of all requests for exclusion Deadline to file replies in support of the settlement, plan of administration, and/or any attorneys’ fees and expenses; and Deadline to file proof of notice Final fairness hearing Fourteen (14) calendar days prior to the settlement hearing Seven (7) calendar days prior to the settlement hearing At the court’s convenience, but no fewer than one-hundred (100) days after the court’s preliminary approval order (7) The final approval hearing is hereby preliminarily set for October 16, 2020 at 10:30 a.m., in Courtroom 3, William J. Nealon Federal Building & Courthouse, 235 N. Washington Avenue, Scranton, PA 18501; and (8) In accordance with the above schedule provided by the parties, thirtyfive (35) days prior to the final fairness hearing, the parties shall file motions and memoranda in support of final approval of the settlement agreement. s/ Malachy E. Mannion MALACHY E. MANNION United States District Judge DATE: July 8, 2020 16-0085-05-ORDER -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?