Tillery v. Wetzel et al

Filing 50

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). (1) Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Discovery 30 is DENIED as moot in light of his filing of his second Motion to Compel Discovery 36 . (2) Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Discovery 36 is DENIED without prejudice. (3) Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint 34 is DENIED.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 10/18/18. (dw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MAJOR GEORGE TILLERY,
Plaintiff,

NO. 3:16-CV-0235

v.

(JUDGE CAPUTO)

JOHN WETZEL, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
NOW, this 18th day of October, 2018, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
(1)

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery (Doc. 30) is DENIED as moot
in light of his filing of his second Motion to Compel Discovery (Doc. 36).

(2)

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery (Doc. 36) is DENIED without
prejudice.

(3)

Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint (Doc. 34) is
DENIED.
/s/ A. Richard Caputo
A. Richard Caputo
United States District Judge