Bifano et al v. Waymart Borough et al

Filing 50

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry),(1) the Boroughs motion for summary judgment (Doc. 43) is GRANTED IN PART with respect to plaintiffs First Amendment claim;(2) plaintiffs state law claim against the Borough under the Penns ylvania Whistleblower Law is DISMISSED with leave to file in State Court.(3) the Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT in favor of the Borough with respect to plaintiffs First Amendment claim; and(4) the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. ORDER TERMINATING CASE.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 3/28/19. (bs)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOSEPH BIFANO and KEITH
RYNEARSON

:
:

Plaintiffs

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-245
:

v.

(JUDGE MANNION)
:

WAYMART BOROUGH
:
Defendant
:
ORDER
In accordance with this court’s memorandum issued this same day, IT
IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
(1) the Borough’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 43) is GRANTED
IN PART with respect to plaintiffs’ First Amendment claim;
(2) plaintiffs’ state law claim against the Borough under the Pennsylvania
Whistleblower Law is DISMISSED with leave to file in State Court.
(3) the Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT in favor of the
Borough with respect to plaintiffs’ First Amendment claim; and
(4) the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.
s/

Malachy E. Mannion

MALACHY E. MANNION
United States District Judge
DATE: March 28, 2019
16-245-03